Sex malyalam age 45 msn not updating

Rated 3.80/5 based on 905 customer reviews

But I have taken the liberty to provide you with 108 other proofs and logical points which tell us that the structure known as the Taj Mahal is actually Tejo Mahalaya. Visit Sword Of Truth – Online Magazine for more information Proofs follow below: 1.There is a similar story behind every Islamic structure in Bharat. As I mentioned above, hundreds of thousands of temples in Bharat have been destroyed by the Muslim invaders and I shall dedicate several articles to these destroyed temples. The term Tajmahal itself never occurs in any mogul court paper or chronicle even in Aurangzeb’s time.The Muslims started their rule over India in 712 A. Aurangzeb himself destroyed 10,000 Hindu temples during his reign! During their rule they looted and destroyed hundreds of thousands of Hindu temples.However, the scope of this article is to prove to you beyond the shadow of any doubt that Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya and should be recognized as such! The attempt to explain it away as Taj-i-mahal is therefore, ridiculous. The ending “Mahal” is never muslim because in none of the muslim countries around the world from Afghanistan to Algeria is there a building known as “Mahal”. The unusual explanation of the term Tajmahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal, who is buried in it, is illogical in at least two respects viz., firstly her name was never Mumtaj Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani and secondly one cannot omit the first three letters “Mum” from a woman’s name to derive the remainder as the name of the building. Since the lady’s name was Mumtaz (ending with ‘Z’) the name of the building derived from her should have been Taz Mahal, if at all, and not Taj (spelled with a ‘J’). Several European visitors of Shahjahan’s time allude to the building as Taj-e-Mahal is almost the correct tradition, age old Sanskrit name Tej-o-Mahalaya, signifying a Shiva temple.Not as a monument to the dead Mumtaz Mahal–an insignificant sex object in the incestuous Shah Jahan’s harem of 5,000. Contrarily Shahjahan and Aurangzeb scrupulously avoid using the Sanskrit term and call it just a holy grave. The tomb should be understood to signify Not A Building but only the grave or centotaph inside it.

It depicts Aurangzeb’s letter to Shah Jahan in Persian in which he has unintentionally revealed the true identity of the Taj Mahal as a Hindu Temple-Palace. Aurangzeb’s letter to his father Shah Jahan written in Persian. 275) Take the time to read the proofs stated below and know to what extent we have been lied to by our own leaders. For more information you can order the book, Taj Mahal – The True Story authored by Shri P. Both its components namely, ‘Taj’ and’ Mahal’ are of Sanskrit origin. The term Taj Mahal is a corrupt form of the Sanskrit term Tejo Mahalay signifying a Shiva Temple.

Jaisingh was apparently so enraged at the blatant seizure of the Tajmahal that he refused to oblige Shahjahan by providing marble for grafting koranic engravings and fake centotaphs for further desecration of the Tajmahal.

Jaisingh looked at Shahjahan’s demand for marble and stone cutters, as an insult added to injury.

Aurangzeb, therefore, ordered immediate repairs to the buildings at his own expense while recommending to the emperor that more elaborate repairs be carried out later.

This is the proof that during Shahjahan’s reign itself that the Taj complex was so old as to need immediate repairs. The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur retains in his secret personal Kapad Dwara collection two orders from Shahjahan dated Dec 18, 1633 (bearing modern nos.

Leave a Reply